The Tapestry

May 13, 2007 entry:  Repulsion

 

   I was repulsed to learn that the June ’07 Harper’sBazaar cover will feature Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie. Is this what a major fashion magazine with a 140 year history has sunk to? Featuring untalented, useless airheads who love to publicly flaunt their self-degradation yet need to disappear out of the public’s sight and get their miserable lives in order. These young and disturbed women need to be institutionalized, flushed out, sober-up and come into focus as they are causing too many young women to imitate their lousy behavior…and educators like myself have to deal with their debris.

  In the October 26, 1998 Tapestry entry, I commented on how, “Mothers have failed, Fathers have failed, families have failed…and each wants a scapegoat, failing to look within, accept, purge and improve…it is a cycle that can be broken if each person takes self-responsibility and stop blaming others for their shortcomings, problems or failures.” I saw then the burgeoning next generation’s gravitation towards valuing The Seven Deadlies more than their Seven Virtuous counterparts. Pride, Envy, Gluttony, Lust, Anger, Greed, and Sloth vs. Humility, Kindness, Abstinence, Chastity, Patience, Liberality and Diligence. The latter outweighs the former- in a civilized society. These tenants are what parents must not only teach, but embed in their offspring’s minds as “the first teacher is home”. These misguided youths have no guidance and unfortunately, when they are let loose on society, discord follows and thus delinquent and criminal behavior ensues. What is attractive about that? 

  Harper’sBazaar magazine celebrates its 140th anniversary this year as “the longest continuously published fashion magazine in the world”. Throughout the year, its gorgeous history is being highlighted within each issue. My Mother was a subscriber, and now I am, as it is important to keep abreast of the latest in fashion and beauty, lifestyle and entertainment and well-being. Intelligent and sophisticated women were always the intended audience and the cover featured true models. Which is why I am repulsed by the upcoming Paris Hilton- out-of-control, vulgar, ignorant and irresponsible heiress- and her Simple Life co-star and equally troubled friend, Nicole Ritchie. I DO NOT ADMIRE YOUNG WOMEN WHO PROMOTE SELF-DESTRUCTION!!! I DO NOT APPRECIATE BAZAAR FEATURING THEM ON THE COVER…THEY ARE NOT WORTHY. (See August 17, 1999 Tapestry entry) What have these young women accomplished other than being wealthy, spoiled, clueless and offensive?  What have they contributed to society other than more sleaze? What type of example are they setting for the next generation of young women who follow popular culture like it is a religion? What purpose do they serve? Why are they on the cover of Bazaar? True, they can afford the featured merchandise, they are excellent customers; but money cannot buy class. It’s obvious. They are a disgrace to Harper’s Bazaar’s history, past and present subscribers and many of the accomplished and refined women who are never featured in its gilded pages.

   Instead of featuring actresses and singers on the covers, it would be wise for the fashion industry to re-adjust its tuning and resurrect the cover MODEL a la Iman, Carmen, Beverly Johnson, Lauren Hutton, Gia, Linda Evangalista, Christy Turlington, Naomi Campbell, et al. I am sick of every fashion magazine resembling an entertainment publication rather than what it is suppose to be about: FASHION. I have found more inspiration in the kingdom of fashion and designers than in any actress or singer, as the designer is more artist than manufactured robot that performs for a greed and lust driven entertainment machine. It would also be wise to push the celebrity to the back of more top fashion shows as their presence interferes with and distracts from the fashions. I miss CNN’s Style with Elsa Klench, which focused on fashion, beauty and decorating- a mainstay for Saturday mornings back in the day.

   Feminism is still evolving yet with the continuous and rapid spewing out of pop-tarts and airheads on the masses, we are experiencing a throw back:  women are not meat, candy or toys. Academia must flex its muscle, put this madness in context with the world and its future and crush The Repulsive in all its forms.

 

Gabrielle Lin